The WSJ has a look at the radical Bill Ayers/Barack Obama connection. They aren’t just passing friends, they worked hard together in Obama’s earlier years to help make schools more radical. Here is an exerpt:
Despite having authored two autobiographies, Barack Obama has never written about his most important executive experience. From 1995 to 1999, he led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists.
Bill Ayers.
The CAC was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s. Among other feats, Mr. Ayers and his cohorts bombed the Pentagon, and he has never expressed regret for his actions. Barack Obama’s first run for the Illinois State Senate was launched at a 1995 gathering at Mr. Ayers’s home.
The Obama campaign has struggled to downplay that association. Last April, Sen. Obama dismissed Mr. Ayers as just “a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” and “not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis.” Yet documents in the CAC archives make clear that Mr. Ayers and Mr. Obama were partners in the CAC. Those archives are housed in the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago and I’ve recently spent days looking through them.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was created ostensibly to improve Chicago’s public schools. The funding came from a national education initiative by Ambassador Walter Annenberg. In early 1995, Mr. Obama was appointed the first chairman of the board, which handled fiscal matters. Mr. Ayers co-chaired the foundation’s other key body, the “Collaborative,” which shaped education policy.
The CAC’s basic functioning has long been known, because its annual reports, evaluations and some board minutes were public. But the Daley archive contains additional board minutes, the Collaborative minutes, and documentation on the groups that CAC funded and rejected. The Daley archives show that Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda.
One unsettled question is how Mr. Obama, a former community organizer fresh out of law school, could vault to the top of a new foundation? In response to my questions, the Obama campaign issued a statement saying that Mr. Ayers had nothing to do with Obama’s “recruitment” to the board. The statement says Deborah Leff and Patricia Albjerg Graham (presidents of other foundations) recruited him. Yet the archives show that, along with Ms. Leff and Ms. Graham, Mr. Ayers was one of a working group of five who assembled the initial board in 1994. Mr. Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval.
Ed Morrissey says: “Ayers wanted teachers trained to instruct against “oppression” and to push schoolchildren towards political beliefs Ayers valued — apparently valuing them higher than actual education. Barack Obama agreed, and for several years worked in close partnership with Ayers to implement that educational policy. Even had Ayers never tossed a single bomb, this kind of educational philosophy would likely raise eyebrows with most parents, who desire a real education for their children and not some sort of political indoctrination camp. . . . What does that say about Obama’s idea of mainstream, as he has repeatedly described Ayers and Dohrn?”
That’s what I want to know? What exactly is mainstream in Obama’s opinion? So far, he seems quite radical to me. You know why he can’t articulate well without a teleprompter…because he doesn’t want middle America to know what he really thinks and feels. He’s saving that for after he wins and lucky for most of us, he’s not going to win.
Americans aren’t that stupid.
Aw c’mon, Ayers was just a guy from the nieghborhood, I borrowed his cordless drill one time and forgot to give it back.
And Rezko was just a local real estate guy, he gave me a refrigerator magnet.
Oh, and Rev. Wright? I always fell asleep in church so I have no idea what he said.
So, I guess that UIC is in the wrong for employing a “terrorist” and giving him a Distinguished Professorship.
And the Woods Fund – the other organization that he and Obama served on – is guilty is for allowing this evil man on their board.
Give me a break….
in a word .. yes
Sorry but Americans are a bit stupid in choosing a President.
They vote for GWB twice and when you do that, you are stupid.
Now in the end 90% of the Americans wants him gone.
Don’t make the same mistake again.
DutchQueen:
When Americans are given Al Gore and John Kerry as the alternatives to GWB – there really wasn’t much choice – was there?